• Thursday, Apr 2nd, 2026

International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and TechnologY(IJARETY)
International, Double Blind-Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journal, Open Access Journal
|Approved by NSL & NISCAIR |Impact Factor: 8.152 | ESTD: 2014|

|Scholarly Open Access Journals, Peer-Reviewed, and Refereed Journal, Impact Factor-8.152 (Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool), Multidisciplinary, Bi-Monthly, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)|

Article

TITLE A Comparative Study of the Rule of Law in India and the England Legal System
ABSTRACT The Rule of Law is a foundational principle of constitutionalism and democratic governance, ensuring that all actions of the state are exercised within the limits of law and that no individual or authority is above legal control. This research paper undertakes a comparative study of the Rule of Law as it operates in India and the England legal system, examining its historical evolution, constitutional foundations, and contemporary relevance in administrative governance. Originating as a common law concept in England, the Rule of Law was classically articulated by A. V. Dicey, who emphasized supremacy of law, equality before law, and the predominance of legal spirit. Over time, this concept has undergone significant transformation in both jurisdictions. In England, the Rule of Law developed through judicial decisions and constitutional conventions within an unwritten constitutional framework, operating alongside the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. The English legal system relies heavily on common law principles and judicial control to prevent arbitrary administrative action. In contrast, India adopted the Rule of Law as a basic feature of its written Constitution, embedding it explicitly and implicitly through provisions guaranteeing equality, fundamental rights, and judicial review. The Indian judiciary has played an expansive role in interpreting the Rule of Law, extending it to include substantive due process, protection of human rights, and administrative fairness. This comparative study highlights both similarities and differences in the application of the Rule of Law in the two legal systems. While both systems aim to restrain arbitrary power and ensure accountability of public authorities, their constitutional structures, scope of judicial review, and approaches to administrative discretion differ significantly. The paper emphasizes that despite contextual variations, the Rule of Law remains central to maintaining legality, justice, and good governance. The comparative analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of how constitutional and administrative law function to uphold democratic values in India and England.
AUTHOR Bendre Jyoti Dadasaheb, Dr. Pravin Kumar Chuhan Research Scholar, Department of Law, Monad University, Hapur, UP, India Professor, Department of Law, Monad University, Harpur, UP, India
VOLUME 12
DOI DOI:10.15680/IJARETY.2025.1206034
PDF 34_A Comparative Study of the Rule of Law in India and the England Legal System.pdf
KEYWORDS
References 1. Dicey, A. V. (1959). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution (10th ed.). London, UK: Macmillan.
2. Wade, H. W. R., & Forsyth, C. F. (2014). Administrative law (11th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Jain, M. P. (2018). Indian constitutional law (8th ed.). New Delhi, India: LexisNexis.
4. Basu, D. D. (2021). Introduction to the Constitution of India (26th ed.). Gurugram, India: LexisNexis.
5. Craig, P. (2015). Administrative law (8th ed.). London, UK: Sweet & Maxwell.
6. De Smith, S. A., Woolf, H., & Jowell, J. (2013). Judicial review of administrative action (7th ed.). London, UK: Sweet & Maxwell.
7. Garner, J. (2017). Administrative law (10th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Seervai, H. M. (2013). Constitutional law of India (4th ed.). New Delhi, India: Universal Law Publishing.
9. Allan, T. R. S. (2001). Constitutional justice: A liberal theory of the rule of law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Raz, J. (1979). The authority of law: Essays on law and morality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Dicey, A. V. (1915). Lectures on the relation between law and public opinion in England. London, UK: Macmillan.
12. Griffith, J. A. G. (1991). The politics of the judiciary (4th ed.). London, UK: Fontana Press.
13. Bingham, T. (2011). The rule of law. London, UK: Penguin Books.
14. Austin, G. (1999). Working a democratic constitution: The Indian experience. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
15. Sathe, S. P. (2003). Judicial activism in India: Transgressing borders and enforcing limits. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
16. Markesinis, B. S. (2006). Judicial review and the rule of law in England and India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Peiris, G. L. (1991). Public law and human rights. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Lake House Bookshop.
18. Young, A. L. (2016). Turbulent times: Britain’s constitutional future. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Thio, L. (2012). A treatise on the rule of law. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
20. Dicey, A. V. (1982). Law of the constitution. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
21. Wade, E. C. S. (1966). Constitutional fundamentals. London, UK: Stevens & Sons.
22. McLean, I., & McMillan, A. (2015). State of the union: How the UK really works. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Jain, M. P. (2016). Administrative law of India (7th ed.). New Delhi, India: LexisNexis.
24. Elliott, M., & Thomas, R. (2020). Public law (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25. Baxi, U. (2008). The rule of law in India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
26. Dicey, A. V. (2005). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.